A Lioness? Why Aslan’s Mane Is Important to ‘Narnia’ | Opinion

Opinion by Icarus

The following opinion piece has been adapted from a thread on the NarniaWeb Discussion Forum and features inputs from multiple forum contributors.

Lucy buried her head in his mane to hide from his face. But there must have been magic in his mane. She could feel lion-strength going into her.

Prince Caspian (Chapter 11)

With the recent news that three-time Academy Award winning actress Meryl Streep is in talks to play Aslan in Greta Gerwig’s upcoming adaptation of the Magician’s Nephew, it raises the possibility that Aslan will, for the first time in any filmed adaptation, be portrayed as a female Lioness, rather than a male Lion.

A switch of this nature therefore raises numerous potential implications for any future Narnia adaptations in the series, due to the fact that female Lions, unlike male Lions, do not have manes.

Female lions apparently can, in certain exceptionally rare circumstances grow manes in nature, but in general, Lions are one of many creatures where the males and the females of the species look significantly different from one another.

Below we discuss some of the key impacts that a mane-less Aslan could have for the series.

1. Iconography

First and foremost, the image of Aslan with his radiant mane, is perhaps one of the most iconic and enduring pieces of visual imagery, not just within the Chronicles of Narnia itself, but also within children’s literature as a whole.

It is quite literally the cover image for the majority of the Narnia collected edition books, and in terms of wider popular culture, it is probably up there alongside the Wardrobe and the Lamppost as one of the single most quintessentially Narnian visuals.

It is difficult therefore to fathom what could possible be gained from discarding such a potent and highly marketable symbol, one that for many people is the single most important and defining visual image of the entire series.

2. The Stone Table

In one of the most pivotal scenes of probably the most important book of the entire series, the villain Jadis, quite literally strips Aslan of his mane, in a powerful and symbolic demonstration of evil triumphing over good.

“Stop!” said the Witch. “Let him first be shaved.” Another roar of mean laughter went up from her followers as an ogre with a pair of shears came forward and squatted down by Aslan’s head. Snip-snip-snip went the shears and masses of curling gold began to fall to the ground. Then the ogre stood back and the children, watching from their hiding-place, could see the face of Aslan looking all small and different without its mane. The enemies also saw the difference.” 

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (Chapter 14)

There is of course a certain irony in the director of any Narnia adaptation coming to embody the actions of its primary villain by quite literally depriving Aslan of his mane, but there are also significant cinematic ramifications as well.

In a visual medium such as film, the symbolic act of shaving Aslan’s mane allows you to convey so much information to the audience with such a simple and striking visual moment. The Walden films in particular really leaned into the iconography of this moment by having the White Witch subsequently wear Aslan’s discarded mane into battle.

3. The Prophecy

In a less pivotal, but still no less memorable part of the book, Mr Beaver recites the words of prophecy to the children, which had been passed down between generations of Narnians, and which sets into motion the events of the story:

Wrong will be right, when Aslan comes in sight,
At the sound of his roar, sorrows will be no more,
When he bares his teeth, winter meets its death,
And when he shakes his mane, we shall have spring again

The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe (Chapter 8)

This is again something which the Walden movies actively leaned into with their production design, by having the final line of the prophecy engraved down one side of Peter’s sword, Rhindon.

Whilst it may be easy enough for a good writer to work around this issue, it is none-the-less a frustratingly unnecessary change caused by any switch from Lion to Lioness.

4. Riding on Aslan’s Back

Another hugely iconic scene from ‘The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe’ features Lucy and Susan holding onto Aslan’s mane as they ride on his back to join the battle following Aslan’s dramatic resurrection.

Not only does this image feature on numerous book covers, and stage play posters, but it also features as the cover illustration for the very first published edition of ‘The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe’ from 1950,

Whilst it is no doubt theoretically possible to ride on the back of a Lioness without having a mane to hold onto, the lack of one undoubtedly makes it much harder for an audience to suspend their disbelief over the matter, and just makes what is already a visually complex scene ever so slightly more difficult to bring to life on the big screen.

5. Characters Burying Themselves in Aslan’s Mane

At several key points, across multiple stories, there are fairly crucial scenes in which the characters bury themselves in Aslan’s mane for comfort.

She felt her heart would burst if she lost a moment. And the next thing she knew was that she was kissing him and putting her arms as far round his neck as she could and burying her face in the beautiful rich silkiness of his mane.

Prince Caspian (Chapter 10)

Further, when Aslan is going to meet the White Witch at the Stone Table, he asks Susan and Lucy to hold on to his mane in the midst of his own despair:

“Aslan! Dear Aslan!” said Lucy, “what is wrong? Can’t you tell us?”

“Are you ill, dear Aslan?” asked Susan.

“No,” said Aslan. “I am sad and lonely. Lay your hands on my mane so that I can feel you are there and let us walk like that.”

The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe (Chapter 14)

As well as the pure symbolism of these moments, they also make for great cinematic visuals which are rich with emotion. By having a mane-less Aslan, you needlessly deprive yourself of these intimate and visually compelling character moments.

6. Aslan as a Metaphor for the Sun

One of the strongest visual motifs of ‘The Voyage of the Dawn Treader’, and a central argument of Dr Michael Ward’s ‘Planet Narnia’ theory, is the idea of Aslan as a metaphor for the sun.

This visual iconography, which associates Aslan’s golden radiant mane with that of the sun, was even used a the central image on the sail of the Dawn Treader ship in the BBC TV adaptation from 1989.

For such a powerful visual motif, which perfectly encapsulates the notion of sailing East towards Aslan’s Country and the rising sun, removing Aslan’s mane yet again deprives you of another iconic thematic image around which to structure your visual storytelling.

7. Shift’s Entire Plan in ‘The Last Battle’

Possibly one of the biggest narrative problems which arises from Aslan not having a mane is Shift’s entire plan in The Last Battle. The central conceit of the plot revolves around Shift the Ape finding a Lion’s Skin, complete with mane, floating in the river.

By dressing up his donkey accomplice Puzzle in the Lion’s mane, he manages to convince the creatures of Narnia that he is Aslan, leading to an apocalyptic sequence of events which ends in the destruction of Narnia itself.

Without the transformative effect that the Lion’s mane provides in changing Puzzle’s overall visual profile and appearance, particularly when viewed in silhouette by the dim light of Stable Hill, it is difficult to imagine how Shift could possibly pull off this plan in a universe where Aslan doesn’t even have a mane in the first place.

The idea of merely draping the skin of a Lioness over the frame of a donkey would likely be of insufficient visual impact to set him apart him from any other common four-legged animal.

Even just putting aside the plot mechanics here though, the use of the mane in this story is not just a convenient plot device, but it is also a pivotal thematic symbol of Aslan himself, and a crucial piece of cultural iconography, both to the reader of the book, and to the inhabitants of Narnia within the story.

8. The Lion as the “King of Beasts”

Perhaps the main reason that C.S. Lewis chose a Lion to represent the most important character in the world of Narnia is the reputation that Lions have as being the “King of Beasts”.

More so than any other big cat or apex predator in the wild, Lions throughout history have been revered as the Kings of the animal world. This is at least in part due to the majestic and regal appearance of a fully-maned Lion, which evokes the idea of golden halo or aura around their face.

It is therefore difficult to imagine the character of Aslan having the same awe-inspiring visual impact as he does without his mane.

Have an idea or topic for a future opinion piece? Head to the NarniaWeb Discussion Forum to share your thoughts!

20 Responses

  1. The Rose-Tree Dryad says:

    I completely agree with all of this. If it’s true that Aslan has been changed to a female lion in the upcoming film, it’s deeply troubling that the filmmakers would make the choice to visually distance itself from The Chronicles of Narnia as it has always been known to its fans and the public imagination. It would be hard to look at a decision like that and not think that they were deliberately disassociating from the Narnia canon.

  2. Narnian78 says:

    Referring to Aslan as “The Queen of Beasts” would seem out of place. I wouldn’t want to see the Beavers worshipping a lioness. I think if Greta Gerwig wants to satisfy the Narnia fans she will portray Aslan exactly as he is in the story. The people who love the books wouldn’t want it any other way. 🙂

  3. Courtenay says:

    Well said, all of this. It just makes it all the more baffling as to why any film-maker would seriously think a female Aslan is a good move. If this really is being planned — and at this stage, we still don’t have hard evidence that it is, but certainly a disquieting lack of reassurance that it *isn’t* — this article brings out so many reasons why it would change the nature and essence of the stories themselves almost beyond recognition, as well as changing the nature and essence of the particular character. Many thanks to Icarus for compiling and sharing all this.

  4. Col Klink says:

    Thanks for making this into an article, Icarus. Now I can just share it with people instead of having to write my own blog post about how making Aslan a lioness wouldn’t change the plot of The Magician’s Nephew (assuming that’s the first Netflix Narnia movie) but would be an irritating distraction.

    Well, I still might write my own blog post but now it can be shorter. (I’ll just include a link to this in it.) 🙂

    I remember some years ago there was controversy about a cover for an ebook of Anne of Green Gables that portrayed the main character as a blonde. That’s how Aslan without a mane would seem to me. LOL.

  5. Reepicheep775 says:

    Thanks for writing this, Icarus! I couldn’t agree more.

  6. rod says:

    I loved the idea of this new Aslan. its such a refreshing way to see the story. i am here for meryl streep too!

  7. Angie says:

    Does it matter if Aslan is portrayed as female?
    Yes; Aslan came as God to the world of Narnia as Jesus came as God to our world, and Jesus came as a MAN. We ought to strive to be faithful to the truth, as Lewis tried to be. God cannot be an impersonal “force of good” (see “Mere Christianity”) because an “impersonal force” could not forgive, and thus He must be a Person. As a Person, He must be either male or female, not both, and He is definitively male in the Bible, His written Word. Please, please be faithful to the truth, Greta. “Every good and perfect gift comes from above, coming down from the Father [note the male designation] of heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows.” -James 1:17

  8. Jill says:

    I hope the team putting together the Netflix adaptation read this article!

  9. EJH says:

    Disney/Walden mentioned that Aslan’s mane was incredibly expensive to animate. Maybe, if the rumor is true, then Netflix is trying to save budget with a lioness instead.
    If Netflix wants to change Aslan, though, there are probably many other things they are changing. I can still enjoy most of Prince Caspian (2008) even though I was really disappointed in how the writers changed Peter and still can’t trust myself not to cry during the night raid scene. But there is a certain point where too many changes mean it won’t feel Narnian at all and I won’t find reasons to watch.

  10. Kamyk says:

    God chose to use He/Him pronouns. Please, respect that.

  11. IAMLIONHEART says:

    Absolutely agree. Thank you, Icarus and Narniaweb!

  12. Col Klink says:

    @EJH, thanks for the reminder about the expense. Any possible explanation is kind of nice right now.

  13. EK says:

    You realize the lioness story was released on April fools day, right?

    Hold your internet anger till you see a second story about it from a credible source.

  14. Cleander says:

    All of the above. Just hoping they don’t go as far as completely gender-swapping Aslan. That would be far worse than having Streep voicing him as a male character.

  15. Siona says:

    Are people forgetting that C S Lewis may have chosen a male lion for Aslans character, not just because lions are known the world over as ‘the King of beasts’, but also in reference to the biblical ‘Lion of Judah’? There is more significance that the depictions lions have throughout history, that many people choose to overlook, simply because they don’t agree with the intended narrative. I do agree that the role of Aslan should be voiced by a man, and not a woman, in keeping with C S Lewis’ original work.

  16. Brenden Smith says:

    Another problem, specifically for The Magician’s Nephew, is that having a female Aslan damages the symbolism of the creation of Narnia.

    Meryl Streep voicing a male Aslan sounds more believeable considering all of these problems… which is shocking to think about.

  17. OZM says:

    It makes me think of a novel by Charles Williams, Lewis’s friend and fellow Inkling, “The Place of the Lion.” As with all Williams’s novels, it’s a bit hard to explain, but I’ll try anyway.

    The story is about the transformation of living beings so that they are closer to their true nature / the Platonic idea of them. At the very beginning, there is a lioness that has escaped from a circus (IIRC), and she turns into a male lion. That is because the idea of a lion is masculine – a male lion is somehow more of a lion than a lioness is, partially because of the mane’s symbolism.

  18. icarus says:

    @EK we definitely realised that the original story was published when it was April Fools Day in parts of the world, which is why we held off publishing anything about it for more than 48 hours.

    However, the highly respected Industry publication Deadline were then able to corroborate it using their own sources, and Netflix have declined to deny this story to NarniaWeb, Deadline, and every single news site that has contacted them about it.

    Therefore, for now, we are left with no other option other than to treat it as legitimate news.

  19. Rick Kuhn says:

    Great article

  20. A roaring Aslan with a mane looks epic!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *